Thomas R. Carper Water Resources Development Act of 2024 - Detailed breakdown
This page contains a categorized breakdown of provisions within [S. 4367] Thomas R. Carper Water Resources Development Act of 2024. For a high-level summary and broader context, please visit the overview page here.
Crime and Safety
GAO study on Corps of Engineers disaster preparedness
Directs the GAO to analyze the Corps of Engineers' disaster preparedness and response activities, including post-disaster expenditures and information collection.
Establishment of the Office of Disaster Recovery and Resilience
Creates a new office and a deployable disaster team within the Economic Development Administration to manage post-disaster economic recovery efforts.
Study on crime's impact on federal building usage
Requires the Comptroller General to report on how crime rates and safety concerns around federal buildings affect employee in-person work, commuting, and associated costs.
Economy and Commerce
Community revitalization program
Converts the Community Revitalization Pilot Program into a permanent program and removes the 20-project limit.
Revised 'Ability to pay' criteria for non-federal partners
Updates criteria for determining a non-federal partner's cost-sharing ability for water projects, considering factors like per capita income and economic disadvantage.
Reduced cost-share for Kanawha River Basin projects
Reduces the non-Federal cost share to 10 percent for authorized water projects in the Kanawha River Basin, West Virginia, that benefit economically disadvantaged communities.
Public-private partnership user's guide
Directs the Secretary to develop and make publicly available a guide on the use of public-private partnerships for water resources development projects.
GAO study on Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund distribution
Directs the GAO to analyze the distribution of funding from the Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund, including implementation of recent legislative changes.
GAO study on donor ports
Mandates a GAO review of the treatment of donor ports, including funding availability, eligibility criteria, and recommendations for improvement.
Expansion of underserved community harbors program
Expands the program for underserved community harbors to include ecosystem restoration, broadens eligibility to include certain marinas, and extends the program through 2029.
New definitions for economic development
Amends the Public Works and Economic Development Act of 1965 to add definitions for "blue economy", "capacity building", "outdoor recreation", and "travel and tourism".
Expanded criteria for public works and economic development grants
Expands eligibility for grants to include projects for waste management, recycling, and increasing resilience, and adds new considerations like economic diversification, broadband access, and tourism.
Expanded use of grants for administrative expenses
Allows grants under the Public Works and Economic Development Act to be used for administrative expenses, including project predevelopment, updating plans, and hiring professional staff.
Increased federal cost sharing for economic development projects
Increases the default federal share for projects from 50% to 60% and allows up to 100% for small communities with populations under 10,000.
New investment priorities for economic development assistance
Establishes new investment priorities for project eligibility, including critical infrastructure, workforce development, innovation, economic recovery resilience, and manufacturing.
Expanded eligibility for economic adjustment assistance
Expands eligibility for economic adjustment grants to include communities impacted by contractions in the steel, coal, and nuclear industries, as well as those affected by drought.
Critical supply chain site development grant program
Creates a grant program to fund site development and expansion projects to make them ready for manufacturing, supporting industries of strategic importance to the U.S.
Updated distress criteria for economic development grants
Expands the criteria for areas to qualify for economic development assistance, including low income, low workforce participation, and economic distress from energy industry transitions.
Establishment of the Office of Tribal Economic Development
Creates a new office within the Economic Development Administration to coordinate federal economic development activities and assistance for Tribal communities.
Use of commission funds for non-federal grant share
Permits funds available to regional commissions to be used to cover the non-Federal cost-sharing requirement for projects funded by other Federal grant programs.
Expansion of Northern Border and Southwest Border Regional Commissions
Adds several counties in Maine, New Hampshire, New York, New Mexico, and Texas to the areas covered by the Northern Border and Southwest Border Regional Commissions, respectively.
New grant programs for regional commissions
Establishes a State Capacity Building Grant Program for economic development and authorizes grants for demonstration health, nutrition, and child care projects in distressed areas.
Establishment of new regional commissions
Creates the Mid-Atlantic Regional Commission (DE, MD, PA) and the Southern New England Regional Commission (RI, CT, MA) to promote economic development.
Permanent authorization for the Delta Regional Authority
Repeals the termination date for the Delta Regional Authority, extending its authority to promote economic development in the Mississippi River Delta region.
Permanent authorization for the Northern Great Plains Regional Authority
Repeals the termination date for the Northern Great Plains Regional Authority, extending its authority to promote economic development in its designated region.
Inclusion of Indian Tribes in Delta Regional Authority grants
Amends the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act to explicitly include Indian Tribes as eligible entities for grants from the Delta Regional Authority.
| Amount | Description | |
|---|---|---|
| $150,000,000 for each fiscal year | Authorizing appropriations for the Community Revitalization Program. | |
| $170,000,000 | Authorizing appropriations for public works and economic development grants for fiscal year 2025. | |
| $195,000,000 | Authorizing appropriations for public works and economic development grants for fiscal year 2026. | |
| $220,000,000 | Authorizing appropriations for public works and economic development grants for fiscal year 2027. | |
| $245,000,000 | Authorizing appropriations for public works and economic development grants for fiscal year 2028. | |
| $270,000,000 | Authorizing appropriations for public works and economic development grants for fiscal year 2029. | |
| $65,000,000 | Authorizing appropriations for economic adjustment grants annually from fiscal year 2025 through 2029. | |
| $75,000,000 | Authorizing appropriations for assistance to coal communities annually from fiscal year 2025 through 2029. | |
| $35,000,000 | Authorizing appropriations for assistance to nuclear host communities annually from fiscal year 2025 through 2029. | |
| $5,000,000 | Authorizing appropriations for assistance to nuclear host communities annually from fiscal year 2025 through 2027. | |
| $20,000,000 | Authorizing appropriations for the critical supply chain site development grant program annually from fiscal year 2025-2029. | |
| $40,000,000 | Authorizing appropriations for each Regional Commission annually from fiscal year 2025 through 2029. | |
| $35,000,000 | Reauthorizing the Denali Commission for fiscal years 2025 through 2029. | |
| $40,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2025 through 2029 | Reauthorizing appropriations for the Delta Regional Authority to support economic development. | |
| $40,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2025 through 2029 | Reauthorizing appropriations for the Northern Great Plains Regional Authority. |
Education and Research
Expansion of university research support
Adds West Virginia University, Delaware State University, University of Notre Dame, and others to a list of institutions eligible for support for water resources research.
Establishment of university centers for economic development
Authorizes grants to higher education institutions to serve as university centers, ensuring at least one in each state, to provide technical assistance and support economic development strategies.
New workforce training grants program
Establishes a new grant program to support innovative workforce training, including facility construction, equipment acquisition, and a pilot program for state grants to individual trainees.
| Amount | Description | |
|---|---|---|
| $11,000 | Providing up to $11,000 in grants to individual trainees for employment in critical industries. | |
| $25,000,000 | Authorizing appropriations for training, research, and technical assistance grants annually from fiscal year 2025 through 2029. | |
| $50,000,000 | Authorizing appropriations for workforce training grants annually from fiscal year 2025 through 2029. |
Energy and Environment
Drought resilience in ecosystem restoration
Expands the aquatic ecosystem restoration program to include measures that enhance drought resilience, such as wetland restoration and invasive species removal.
Project modifications for drought resiliency
Allows the Secretary to modify water resources projects to provide drought resiliency, including water conservation measures and sediment removal to increase storage capacity.
Public databases for Corps recreational sites
Requires the Secretary to regularly update public databases with information on the operational status and available opportunities at Corps of Engineers recreational sites.
National coastal mapping program
Authorizes the Secretary to carry out a national coastal mapping program to support Corps of Engineers missions, including disseminating data and conducting research.
Missouri River existing features protection
Requires the Secretary to analyze and mitigate potential adverse effects on flooding, navigation, and bank erosion before altering certain in-river features on the Missouri River.
Maximization of beneficial use of dredged material
Sets a national goal that at least 70% of suitable dredged material is used beneficially and requires management plans to maximize this use, especially in vulnerable coastal areas.
Harmful algal bloom demonstration program expansion
Expands the harmful algal bloom program to more water bodies, including Lake Elsinore, CA, and Willamette River, OR, and prioritizes nature-based solutions.
Federal interest determinations for water resource studies
Modifies the process for determining federal interest in water resource studies, prioritizing economically disadvantaged communities and limiting determinations for other communities to 20 per year.
Expansion of watershed and river basin assessments
Adds several new locations, including the Walla Walla River Basin and San Francisco Bay Basin, to the list of authorized watershed assessments and prioritizes feasibility reports for Maui and Pacific territories.
Aquatic invasive species control
Expands the program for controlling aquatic plant growths and invasive species to include monitoring, contingency planning, and adds the Connecticut River Basin to the program.
Columbia River Basin flood storage agreement
Authorizes the Secretary to compensate the Government of Canada for reserving pre-planned flood storage at Hugh Keenleyside Dam to minimize flood risk in the Columbia River Basin until August 2027.
Revisions to recreation facility cost-sharing program
Allows non-Federal public and private nonprofit entities to partner in managing recreation facilities, collect user fees, and retain up to 100% for operation and maintenance.
Retention of recreation fees
Mandates that at least 80 percent of recreation fees collected at a specific water resources development project must be used for operations and maintenance at that same project.
Sense of Congress on water data
Expresses that the Secretary should develop a framework to integrate, share, and use water data, adopt national standards, and ensure public accessibility to improve water management.
Grace F. Napolitano water supply and drought resiliency policy
Establishes a U.S. policy for the Corps of Engineers to maximize opportunities for water supply, water conservation, and drought resiliency at its projects.
Forecast-informed reservoir operations mandate
Requires the Secretary to incorporate forecast-informed reservoir operations into water control manuals for reservoirs to the maximum extent practicable.
Emergency drought operations pilot program
Establishes a pilot program in California, Nevada, and Arizona allowing the Secretary to operate certain projects with water supply as the primary purpose during a drought emergency.
Leveraging federal infrastructure for increased water supply
Authorizes the Secretary to receive and expend funds from non-Federal interests or other Federal agencies to formulate, review, or revise operational documents for certain Federal reservoir projects.
Authorization of new water resource feasibility studies
Authorizes the Secretary to conduct feasibility studies for 162 new water resources development, conservation, and other projects across numerous states and territories.
Authorization of project modification feasibility studies
Authorizes the Secretary to conduct feasibility studies for modifications to 40 existing water resource projects, such as deepening navigation channels or adding new project purposes.
Report on turbidity in Willamette Valley, Oregon
Mandates a report on high turbidity in Willamette Valley reservoirs resulting from drawdowns, including monitoring records and lessons learned.
Report on Florida seagrass rehabilitation
Requires an annual report for five years on efforts to promote, rehabilitate, and enhance seagrass growth in Florida's stormwater treatment areas.
Report on ice jam prevention and mitigation
Mandates a report on the Secretary's efforts to prevent and mitigate flood damages associated with ice jams, including challenges and potential measures.
Studies for modifying project purposes in the Colorado River Basin
Authorizes the Secretary to study adding water supply as an official purpose for Corps of Engineers projects in the Colorado River Basin in Arizona upon request from local or state entities.
Upper Mississippi River System flood risk and resiliency study
Authorizes a comprehensive study to evaluate and recommend measures to improve flood resiliency and reduce flood risk in the Upper Mississippi River System, with a 75% Federal cost share.
Comprehensive study of the Ogallala Aquifer
Authorizes a comprehensive study on water supply, drought resilience, aquifer recharge, and causes of depletion for regions overlying the Ogallala Aquifer.
National Academy of Sciences study on Upper Rio Grande Basin
Directs the Secretary to engage the National Academy of Sciences to study and report on the management and operations of dams and reservoirs in the Upper Rio Grande Basin.
Report on efforts to manage invasive species
Requires the Secretary to assess and report to Congress on the efforts to monitor, control, and eradicate invasive species at water resources development projects across the United States.
Examination of microplastics reduction
Requires the Secretary to report on potential measures to reduce the release of microplastics into the environment associated with the civil works missions of the Corps of Engineers.
Post-disaster watershed assessments for impacted areas
Directs the Secretary to carry out post-disaster watershed assessments for areas of Maui, Hawaii, and Belen, New Mexico, impacted by recent wildfires.
GAO review of environmental review modernization
Requires the GAO to review efforts to improve environmental review processes for project studies, including expanded use of categorical exclusions and programmatic impact statements.
GAO study on barriers to nature-based features
Directs the GAO to analyze institutional barriers within the Corps of Engineers that prevent broader integration of nature-based features in water resources projects.
GAO study on ecosystem services in flood projects
Requires the GAO to analyze the use of ecosystem restoration by the Corps of Engineers for flood control or flood risk management projects.
GAO review of hazardous substance impact on civil works
Requires the GAO to review the impact of material contaminated by hazardous substances on the Corps of Engineers' civil works program, including policies, responsibilities, and costs.
Extension of various water resource and environmental programs
Reauthorizes and extends several programs, including the invasive species in alpine lakes pilot, levee safety initiative, Asian carp control, and pilot programs for rural and disadvantaged communities.
Expanded study of San Francisco Bay shorelines
Expands a study of San Francisco Bay to include Contra Costa county and its ocean shorelines, focusing on sea-level rise adaptation, disadvantaged communities, and nature-based solutions.
Colebrook River Reservoir contract termination
Directs the Secretary to offer an amendment to terminate a contract with the Metropolitan District of Hartford County, Connecticut, releasing their water storage rights and payment obligations.
Stockton Lake water storage reallocation
Directs the Secretary to implement a water storage reallocation at Stockton Lake, Missouri, and enter into a specific water storage agreement with the Southwest Missouri Joint Municipal Water Utility Commission.
Willamette Valley project review modification
Prohibits the completion of a review of Willamette Valley, Oregon projects until an alternative that ceases hydropower operations is formally analyzed.
Expansion of Alaska storm damage prevention program
Amends a previous act to include "riverine erosion" in the scope of the storm damage prevention and reduction program for Alaska.
Chattahoochee River Program amendments
Extends the timeline for developing implementation plans for the Chattahoochee River Basin restoration from 2 years to 4 years.
Expansion of environmental assistance to Hawaii
Amends the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 to include Hawaii in a program providing assistance for environmental restoration and coastal storm risk management.
Illinois River basin restoration extension
Extends the authorization for the Illinois River basin restoration program from 2010 to 2029.
Missouri River mitigation land acquisition restrictions
Restricts land acquisition for the Missouri River mitigation project, requires state governor approval, and prohibits the use of eminent domain.
Pilot program for abandoned mine drainage treatment
Establishes a pilot program to provide financial assistance for publicly owned treatment works for abandoned mine drainage in Ohio, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia, with a 75% Federal cost share.
Western Lake Erie basin study modifications
Modifies the study of the Western Lake Erie basin to include flood risk management and hurricane and storm damage risk reduction.
New environmental infrastructure programs for Oregon and Pennsylvania
Establishes programs for the Secretary to provide design and construction assistance for publicly owned, water-related environmental infrastructure projects in Oregon and Pennsylvania.
Bosque wildlife restoration project program
Establishes a program for wildfire prevention and restoration in the Middle Rio Grande Bosque, including the removal of jetty jacks.
Reduced non-federal share for aquatic plant control
Reduces the non-Federal cost share for the control of aquatic plant growths and invasive species from 50% to 35%.
Authorization of North of Lake Okeechobee Storage Reservoir
Authorizes the Secretary to carry out the North of Lake Okeechobee Storage Reservoir project as part of the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan, based on a non-Federal study.
Expansion of renewable energy program on brownfield sites
Replaces the 'brightfields demonstration program' with a broader 'renewable energy program,' expanding from solar to include wind, geothermal, and other renewable technologies on brownfield sites.
Modernization of environmental reviews
Directs the Secretary of Commerce to report on and implement measures to streamline environmental reviews for economic development projects, such as using more categorical exclusions.
| Amount | Description | |
|---|---|---|
| $15,000,000 | Increasing the per-project limit for aquatic ecosystem restoration projects. | |
| $75,000,000 | Increasing the annual authorization for aquatic ecosystem restoration projects. | |
| $15,000,000 | Increasing the per-project limit for environmental or drought resiliency modifications. | |
| $62,000,000 | Increasing the annual authorization for environmental or drought resiliency modifications. | |
| $15,000,000 | Authorizing appropriations for a national coastal mapping program. | |
| $35,000,000 | Increasing authorization for the harmful algal bloom demonstration program. | |
| $37,600,000 | Compensating Canada for pre-planned flood storage at Hugh Keenleyside Dam for fiscal years 2025, 2026, and 2027. | |
| $120,000,000 | Increasing the authorization for the Chesapeake Bay Oyster Recovery Program. | |
| $50,000,000 | Authorizing a pilot program for abandoned mine drainage treatment works in Ohio, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia. | |
| $40,000,000 | Authorizing funding for Oregon's water-related environmental infrastructure and resource protection projects. | |
| $25,000,000 | Authorizing funding for Pennsylvania's water-related environmental infrastructure and resource protection projects. | |
| $25,000,000 | Authorizing annual funding for the Upper Mississippi River restoration program starting in fiscal year 2025. | |
| $2,115,260,000 | Restoring the Western Everglades as part of the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan. | |
| $63,659,000 | Restoring the Mississippi River ecosystem at Hatchie-Loosahatchie, TN and AR. | |
| $335,409,000 | Restoring the Tres Rios, Arizona ecosystem. | |
| $342,430,000 | Restoring Biscayne Bay Coastal Wetlands in Miami-Dade County, FL. | |
| $5,000,000 | Authorizing appropriations for the renewable energy program annually from fiscal year 2025 through 2029. |
Government Operations
Enhanced outreach and access for water resources projects
Requires the Secretary to ensure non-Federal interests understand project responsibilities, designate community project advisors, and make project information publicly available and consistent across districts.
Congressional oversight of Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) implementation
Mandates the Secretary to develop and submit implementation plans for current and prior WRDA laws to Congress, provide regular briefings, and establish a dedicated implementation team.
Standardized review process for project alterations
Directs the Secretary to establish standardized guidance for the review process of applications from non-Federal entities to alter public works, including pre-application meetings to clarify standards.
Public reporting on permit processing timelines
Requires the Secretary to annually update the Corps of Engineers' public 'permit finder' website to accurately reflect the status of permits funded by non-Federal entities.
Streamlined studies by non-federal interests
Amends the process for non-Federal interests to conduct feasibility studies for water projects, requiring the Secretary to provide clearer guidance and timelines.
Standardization of real estate administrative fees
Directs the Secretary to develop and publish guidance to standardize the processes for developing, updating, and tracking real estate administrative fees for the Corps of Engineers.
Development and sharing of water resources models
Directs the Secretary to develop and maintain economic, hydraulic, and hydrologic models for water projects and to share these models and their data with project partners and the public.
Alternative benefit-cost ratio for projects in non-contiguous states and territories
Requires the Secretary to calculate an alternative benefit-cost ratio for 10 feasibility studies in Hawaii, Alaska, and U.S. territories to adjust for higher construction costs.
Reporting and oversight requirements for the Secretary
Mandates the Secretary to submit initial and annual reports to Congress on the status of numerous previously required reports and to issue prior guidance within 180 days.
Federal funding for St. Marys River feasibility study
Specifies that the feasibility study for modifications to the St. Marys River navigation channels in Michigan shall be conducted entirely at Federal expense.
Use of prior project data for specific feasibility studies
Mandates the use of relevant information from previously conducted projects for new feasibility studies in Massachusetts, Washington, New Mexico, and Florida.
Report on shoreline use permits at Table Rock Lake
Mandates a report on the issuance and modification of shoreline use permits at Table Rock Lake in Missouri and Arkansas, including rules for leasing and transferring permits.
Report on fuel efficiency of Corps vessels
Mandates a report on the fuel efficiency of the Corps of Engineers' vessel fleet, including potential upgrades, replacements, and cost savings.
Report on Corps of Engineers boat ramps
Requires a report detailing the number of boat ramps constructed by the Corps of Engineers, how many are operational, and how many require maintenance.
Report on real estate acquisition authority
Requires the Secretary to report whether they agree with Congress that they have sufficient authority to acquire real estate interests that are less than fee simple title.
Assessment of international project authority
Requires an assessment and report on the extent of the Corps of Engineers' existing authority to construct water resources development projects abroad.
Annual report on harbor maintenance needs and trust fund expenditures
Requires the Secretary to submit an annual report to Congress, starting in fiscal year 2026, detailing harbor maintenance costs, Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund activities, and unmet needs.
Encroachment resolution plan for J. Strom Thurmond Lake
Requires the Secretary to develop a plan to resolve existing property encroachments at J. Strom Thurmond Lake, Georgia, and places a moratorium on compelling their removal without Congressional approval.
New deadline for list of covered water projects
Requires the Secretary to provide the Comptroller General with a list of covered ongoing water resources development projects within 30 days of this Act's enactment.
Review of alternative delivery methods for water projects
Requires a study of the Corps of Engineers' authorities and programs that facilitate the use of alternative delivery methods, such as design-build and public-private partnerships.
Increased funding limit for cooperation authority
Increases the funding limit for certain cooperative agreements under the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 from $1,000,000 to $2,500,000.
GAO review of Corps of Engineers project cost estimates
Mandates the Government Accountability Office (GAO) to review the accuracy of project cost estimates developed by the Corps of Engineers for water resources development projects.
GAO report on project partnership agreements
Directs the GAO to analyze the implications of indemnification clauses and perpetual maintenance responsibilities for non-Federal partners in water resources projects.
GAO review of the Section 408 permit program
Requires the GAO to review the Corps of Engineers' program for permits to alter public works, focusing on trends, efficiency, and consistency.
GAO study on modernizing the Corps of Engineers
Mandates a GAO analysis of opportunities for the Corps of Engineers to modernize its civil works program through technology and improved engineering practices.
GAO study on easements for water resources projects
Directs the GAO to analyze the use of easements provided by non-Federal interests for flood risk, storm damage, and ecosystem restoration projects.
GAO study on federal-state data sharing
Mandates a GAO analysis of coordination on scientific data related to future resiliency, sea-level rise, and flood impacts among federal, state, and academic entities.
GAO study on tribal coordination for cultural resources
Mandates a GAO review of Corps of Engineers procedures for addressing the discovery of Tribal historic or cultural resources at its projects.
GAO study on Corps support for FEMA missions
Directs the GAO to review the Corps of Engineers' role in supporting FEMA missions, including data provided for floodplain mapping and flood insurance.
New process for deauthorizing inactive water projects
Amends the Water Resources Development Act of 2020 to create an expedited process for identifying and deauthorizing non-viable water resources development projects through a public list submitted to Congress.
Authorization of federal land conveyances
Authorizes the Secretary to convey several parcels of federal land in California, Indiana, and Washington to local and state entities for public purposes or fair market value.
Continued presence of structures at Table Rock Lake
Permits certain existing residential structures at the Table Rock Lake project in Missouri and Arkansas to remain until they are abandoned or fail.
Congressional notification for deferred payment agreements
Requires the Secretary to notify Congress quarterly on the status of any requests from non-Federal interests to renegotiate deferred payment agreements for water projects.
Sense of Congress on Missouri River transparency
Expresses that the Secretary should make data and decisions related to Missouri River Basin civil works projects publicly available to ensure transparency.
Authorization for Corps of Engineers facility investments
Authorizes the design and construction of an Operations and Maintenance Building in Galveston, TX, a warehouse in Lee’s Summit, MO, and a joint resident office in Corpus Christi, TX.
Enhanced coordination for economic development
Requires the Secretary of Commerce to convene biennial meetings with Regional Commissions to enhance coordination, reduce duplication, and develop best practices for economic development programs.
Congressional notification for large EDA grants
Requires the Secretary to notify Congress at least 3 business days before awarding any Economic Development Administration grant of $100,000 or more.
Technical assistance liaisons for underresourced communities
Authorizes EDA Regional Directors to designate staff as Technical Assistance Liaisons to help underresourced communities with grant applications.
Enhanced reporting requirements for EDA
Mandates more detailed annual reports to Congress, including specifics on grants to rural areas and timelines for construction projects.
GAO reports on economic development programs
Mandates several Government Accountability Office (GAO) reports to evaluate the effectiveness of EDA programs, identify barriers for small and rural communities, and recommend improvements.
Modifications to regional commission governance
Allows alternate state members of regional commissions to delegate voting authority to a designee and updates quorum requirements for commission meetings.
New administrative powers for regional commissions
Grants regional commissions the authority to collect and expend fees for services and removes the requirement to maintain a government relations office in the District of Columbia.
Inter-agency fund transfers for regional commissions
Authorizes regional commissions to transfer funds to, and accept funds from, other Federal agencies for purposes consistent with the commissions' authorities and the funds' original intent.
Expanded powers for the Denali Commission
Expands the Denali Commission's powers, allowing it to enter into leases and use its funds to cover the non-Federal share required by other grant-in-aid programs.
Extension and reform of the Public Buildings Reform Board
Extends the Public Buildings Reform Board until December 31, 2026, and amends its operations, including reducing quorum requirements and requiring a third round of property sale recommendations.
Federal building space utilization standards
Mandates federal agencies to measure and report on the occupancy of public buildings and leased spaces, aiming for at least 60% utilization. The GSA must take action on underutilized spaces.
Enhanced oversight of federal construction projects
Requires GSA to notify Congress of significant cost or scope changes in projects, report on safety incidents, and provide detailed utilization data for new project proposals.
Review of the Public Buildings Service
Directs the Comptroller General to conduct a comprehensive review of the Public Buildings Service's administration, management, staffing, and spending from the Federal Buildings Fund.
Sale of federal properties
Authorizes the sale of multiple federal properties, including the Webster School in D.C., the Wilbur J. Cohen Federal Building, and property connected to USP Leavenworth.
Report on federal building accessibility
Requires the Comptroller General to report on the compliance of GSA-controlled office buildings with the Architectural Barriers Act of 1968.
Public comment for federal building design standards
Requires the GSA to establish a public comment process for any updates or changes to the P100 facilities standards guidance document for federally owned buildings.
Expiration of project authorizations
Establishes a five-year expiration date for congressional committee resolutions approving federal leases or construction projects if the project is not initiated within that timeframe.
Conveyance of Huntsville Courthouse
Authorizes the conveyance of the Huntsville Courthouse and Post Office to the City of Huntsville, Alabama, in exchange for fair market value.
Designation of multiple federal buildings
Designates or redesignates several federal buildings and courthouses to honor individuals, including Eugene E. Siler, Jr., Senator Dianne Feinstein, Reuben E. Lawson, and others.
| Amount | Description | |
|---|---|---|
| $1,000,000 for each fiscal year | Authorizing appropriations for studies of water resources projects by non-Federal interests. | |
| $90,000,000 | Authorizing appropriations for planning and administrative expense grants annually from fiscal year 2025 through 2029. | |
| $5,000,000 | Authorizing appropriations for technical assistance liaisons annually from fiscal year 2025 through 2029. |
Infrastructure
Acceleration of water resources project studies
Amends the timeline for completing feasibility studies to 4 years after determining Federal interest and sets a maximum total cost of $5,000,000 for these studies.
Minimum real estate interest for water projects
Requires the Secretary to identify the minimum real estate interest necessary for a project, allowing for less than fee simple title when sufficient, and to provide a real estate plan to non-Federal interests.
Alternative project delivery pilot program
Establishes a pilot program allowing non-Federal interests to use alternative methods like design-build for carrying out projects under a continuing authority program, with a limit of 25 projects.
Stormwater management program
Establishes a new program for studies and projects to control, retain, and reuse stormwater, prioritizing urban flood control and the use of natural features.
Broadband infrastructure on Corps lands
Requires the Secretary to update policy guidance to expedite the evaluation and approval of requests to install broadband service infrastructure on Corps of Engineers lands and waters.
Harbor deepening cost-share update
Increases the authorized depth for Federal cost-sharing on harbor deepening projects from 50 feet to 55 feet for both construction and maintenance.
Inland waterways dredge pilot program update
Amends the Inland Waterways Regional Dredge Pilot Program to prioritize projects that improve navigation reliability, increase freight capacity, and enhance containerized cargo availability.
Dredged material disposal facility partnerships
Amends rules for non-Federal entities to use dredged material disposal facilities, requiring fees for use and mandating disposition studies for certain unused facilities.
Removal of abandoned vessels
Authorizes the Secretary to remove abandoned vessels from navigable waters if deemed in the public interest and holds the vessel owner liable for removal costs.
Increased federal cost share for inland waterway projects
Increases the Federal cost share for construction of inland waterway navigation projects from 65 percent to 75 percent, effective October 1, 2024.
Improvements to National Dam Safety Program
Amends the National Dam Safety Program Act by adding a definition for "underserved community" and updating provisions related to the national inventory of dams.
National inventory of dams and low-head dams
Requires the Secretary of the Army to maintain, update, and make publicly available an inventory of dams and low-head dams, including safety information.
Rehabilitation of high hazard potential dams
Requires dam owners receiving grants to have a maintenance plan and subrecipients to develop floodplain management plans to reduce future flood impacts.
Tribal project implementation pilot program
Establishes a pilot program for up to 5 projects, allowing Indian Tribes to directly manage the design and construction of certain water resources projects.
Easement requirements for hurricane and storm damage projects
Allows the Secretary to proceed with hurricane and storm damage reduction projects using nonperpetual easements upon request, with specific notices to the non-Federal interest.
Levee system improvement and eligibility for assistance
Allows non-Federal interests to be eligible for levee repair and rehabilitation assistance if they develop an approved systemwide improvement plan, even with deferred maintenance issues.
Expansion of remote and subsistence harbor criteria
Expands the criteria for remote and subsistence harbor projects to include locations where community viability is threatened or where over 80% of goods are consumed domestically.
Remote operations at Corps of Engineers dams
Authorizes the Secretary to use remote operations at navigation or hydroelectric facilities for a 6-year period after notifying Congress that it will not affect certain activities and addresses security risks.
Assessment of alternate seaports
Requires the Secretary to report to Congress on the operation, maintenance needs, and backlog for Corps of Engineers projects at alternate seaports, recognizing their national security importance.
Expedited modification of existing feasibility studies
Directs the Secretary to expedite and modify several existing feasibility studies for navigation, flood risk, and ecosystem restoration in CA, GA, HI, LA, and NY.
Expedited completion of water resources projects and studies
Mandates the expedited completion of dozens of feasibility studies, reports, and construction projects for flood control, navigation, and ecosystem restoration across the United States.
Expedited review of Texas feasibility studies
Requires the Secretary to expedite the review and coordination of feasibility studies for four navigation and flood control projects in Texas.
Report on Corps of Engineers bridge inventory
Mandates a report on bridges owned, operated, and maintained by the Corps, identifying those that could potentially be transferred to state or local authorities.
Federal funding for Craig Harbor, Alaska reevaluation
Mandates that the cost of completing a general reevaluation report for the navigation project at Craig Harbor, Alaska, shall be at full Federal expense.
Report to Congress on levee safety guidelines
Requires the Secretary to submit a report on the development, use, and voluntary nature of levee safety guidelines, including any recommendations for revisions.
GAO study on dredged material disposal sites
Mandates a GAO study on the costs and limitations of constructing dredged material disposal sites, focusing on aquatic confined placement structures in the Lower Columbia River.
Deauthorization of specific water projects
Deauthorizes various specific water resource projects or portions of projects in California, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Maine, Nebraska, Nevada, New York, North Dakota, Virginia, and Washington.
Study on Lower San Joaquin River deauthorization
Requires the Secretary to report to Congress on the impacts of deauthorizing portions of the flood protection project on the Lower San Joaquin River in California.
Increased funding for Alabama environmental infrastructure
Increases the authorized funding for environmental infrastructure projects in Alabama from $50,000,000 to $85,000,000.
Increased funding for Alameda and Contra Costa Counties, California
Increases the authorized funding for environmental infrastructure in Alameda and Contra Costa Counties, California, from $25,000,000 to $45,000,000.
Increased funding for Calaveras County, California
Increases the authorized funding for environmental infrastructure in Calaveras County, California, from $13,280,000 to $16,300,000.
Increased and specified funding for Contra Costa County, California
Increases total authorized funding to $80,000,000 and specifies allocations for different water and sanitation districts within Contra Costa County.
Increased funding for Los Angeles County, California
Increases the authorized funding for environmental infrastructure in Los Angeles County, California, from $103,000,000 to $128,000,000.
Modified Los Angeles County environmental assistance program
Sets the Federal cost share at 90% for projects in economically disadvantaged communities and increases total authorized funding from $50,000,000 to $100,000,000.
Modified project for Los Osos, California
Expands the project description from 'Wastewater' to 'Water and wastewater' and increases authorized funding from $35,000,000 to $43,000,000.
Increased funding for San Bernardino County, California
Increases the authorized funding for environmental infrastructure in San Bernardino County, California, from $9,000,000 to $24,000,000.
Increased funding for South Perris, California
Increases the authorized funding for environmental infrastructure in South Perris, California, from $50,000,000 to $100,000,000.
Increased funding for Palm Beach County, Florida
Increases the authorized funding for environmental infrastructure in Palm Beach County, Florida, from $7,500,000 to $57,500,000.
Increased funding for Atlanta, Georgia
Increases the authorized funding for environmental infrastructure in Atlanta, Georgia, from $75,000,000 to $100,000,000.
Increased funding for Guam
Increases the authorized funding for environmental infrastructure in Guam from $10,000,000 to $35,000,000.
Increased funding for Maui, Hawaii
Increases the authorized funding for environmental infrastructure in Maui, Hawaii, from $20,000,000 to $50,000,000.
Increased funding for Cook and Lake Counties, Illinois
Increases the authorized funding for environmental infrastructure in Cook and Lake Counties, Illinois, from $100,000,000 to $149,000,000.
Modified project for Madison and St. Clair Counties, Illinois
Adds stormwater management to the project scope and increases authorized funding from $100,000,000 to $150,000,000.
Expanded project area for South Central Illinois
Expands the geographic scope of the environmental infrastructure project to include Fayette, Shelby, Jasper, Richland, Crawford, and Lawrence counties.
Increased funding for Macomb County, Michigan
Increases the authorized funding for environmental infrastructure in Macomb County, Michigan, from $40,000,000 to $90,000,000.
Increased funding for Michigan infrastructure
Increases the authorized funding for Michigan's combined sewer overflow and other water infrastructure projects from $85,000,000 to $160,000,000.
Increased funding for DeSoto County, Mississippi
Increases the authorized funding for environmental infrastructure in DeSoto County, Mississippi, from $130,000,000 to $170,000,000.
Modified cost-sharing for Northern Missouri
Sets the Federal cost share at 90% for environmental infrastructure projects benefiting economically disadvantaged communities in Northern Missouri.
Increased funding for Central New Mexico
Increases the authorized funding for environmental infrastructure in Central New Mexico from $100,000,000 to $150,000,000.
Increased funding for Queens, New York
Increases the authorized funding for environmental infrastructure in Queens, New York, from $119,200,000 to $190,000,000.
Consideration of natural infrastructure for New York City watershed
Allows the Secretary to consider natural and nature-based infrastructure when carrying out projects for the New York City watershed.
Increased funding for North Carolina
Increases the authorized funding for environmental infrastructure projects in North Carolina from $13,000,000 to $50,000,000.
Modified project for Southwestern Oregon
Increases authorized funding from $50,000,000 to $100,000,000 and adds Lincoln County to the project's geographic scope.
Modified project for Northeast Pennsylvania
Increases authorized funding from $20,000,000 to $70,000,000 and expands the project scope to include water and wastewater infrastructure and water supply.
Increased funding for Lakes Marion and Moultrie, South Carolina
Increases the authorized funding for environmental infrastructure projects for Lakes Marion and Moultrie, South Carolina, from $165,000,000 to $235,000,000.
Increased funding for Smith County, Tennessee
Increases the authorized funding for environmental infrastructure in Smith County, Tennessee, from $19,500,000 to $69,500,000.
Increased funding for Dallas County region, Texas
Increases the authorized funding for environmental infrastructure in the Dallas County region, Texas, from $40,000,000 to $100,000,000.
Increased funding for Texas infrastructure
Increases the authorized funding for environmental infrastructure projects in Texas from $80,000,000 to $200,000,000.
Modified Western Rural Water program
Expands the program to include natural infrastructure and drought resilience measures, adds a definition for non-Federal interest, and increases total funding authorizations.
Environmental infrastructure pilot program for disadvantaged communities
Establishes a pilot program allowing the Federal cost share for certain environmental infrastructure projects to increase to 90% for economically disadvantaged communities, expiring in 7 years.
Increased federal share for various water projects
Sets the Federal cost share to 100% for the Selma, Alabama flood risk project and 90% for Florida's northern estuaries restoration and the Matagorda Ship Channel corrective action in Texas.
Santa Ana River Mainstem project modification
Modifies the Santa Ana River project to treat the Santiago Creek Channel as a separable element and requires minimizing impacts to trees during construction.
New Savannah Bluff Lock and Dam modification
Modifies the New Savannah Bluff Lock and Dam project to include full repair, maintaining a stable pool, constructing a fish passage, and conveying an adjacent park to Augusta-Richmond County, Georgia.
Increased federal share for Brandon Road project maintenance
Sets the Federal share for the first 10 years of operation and maintenance costs for the Great Lakes and Mississippi River Interbasin project at Brandon Road, Illinois, at 90%.
Credit for Morganza to the Gulf project
Allows the non-Federal sponsor for the Morganza to the Gulf of Mexico project in Louisiana to receive credit for the cost of certain interim flood protection work carried out since March 31, 1989.
Reduced non-federal share for certain projects
Sets the non-Federal cost share at 10% for features of the Mamaroneck-Sheldrake Rivers project and for critical restoration projects in the Lake Champlain Watershed that benefit disadvantaged communities.
Environmental assistance program for Western Washington
Establishes a program for environmental assistance to non-Federal interests in nine Washington counties for water-related infrastructure and resource protection projects, with a 75% Federal cost share.
Delaware Coastal System Program establishment
Designates several coastal storm risk management projects in Delaware as a single, comprehensive program and sets the Federal cost-share at 80 percent.
Cost-share reduction for Delaware coastal storm study
Sets the non-Federal cost share at 10% for the Delaware Inland Bays and Delaware Bay Coast Coastal Storm Risk Management Study and resulting projects assisting economically disadvantaged communities.
Environmental infrastructure program for Kentucky and West Virginia
Establishes a program to provide design and construction assistance for water-related environmental infrastructure projects in Kentucky and West Virginia, with a 75% Federal cost share.
Emergency shore restoration for New York after Nor'easters
Authorizes the Secretary to repair or restore federally authorized storm damage reduction structures and public beaches in specific New York areas damaged by Nor'easters.
Expanded scope for NY/NJ Harbor flood study
Modifies the New York and New Jersey Harbor and Tributaries flood study to investigate projects that maximize public, ecological, and societal benefits from comprehensive flood risk reduction.
Environmental infrastructure program for Southeastern North Carolina
Establishes a program for environmental assistance for water-related infrastructure in eleven counties in Southeastern North Carolina, with a 75% Federal cost share.
Cost-share reduction for Ohio and North Dakota infrastructure
Reduces the non-Federal cost share to 10% for water-related environmental infrastructure projects in Ohio and North Dakota that benefit an economically disadvantaged community.
Increased federal share for Washington metro water supply study
Increases the Federal cost share to 90% for the feasibility study of the water supply project for the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area.
Full federal funding for Acequias pre-design planning
Makes the Federal share for pre-design planning costs for Acequias irrigation system projects 100%.
Changes to dam rehabilitation program
Amends the cost-sharing for rehabilitating Corps of Engineers dams and requires specific Congressional authorization for projects with a Federal share over $60 million.
Authorization of water resources projects
Authorizes the Secretary to carry out various water resources development, conservation, navigation, flood control, and ecosystem restoration projects across the United States.
Redistribution of TIFIA highway funding
Redirects unobligated contract authority from the TIFIA credit assistance program to States for various highway and transportation projects, administered like other Federal-aid highway funds.
High-speed broadband deployment initiative
Authorizes grants for broadband projects, including planning and infrastructure, and allows public-private partnerships and consortia as eligible recipients.
| Amount | Description | |
|---|---|---|
| $5,000,000 | Establishing a maximum total cost for feasibility studies. | |
| $50,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2025 through 2032 | Authorizing appropriations for an alternative project delivery pilot program for continuing authority projects. | |
| $50,000,000 | Increasing the authorization for emergency streambank and shoreline protection projects. | |
| $15,000,000 | Increasing the per-project limit for emergency streambank and shoreline protection. | |
| $62,500,000 | Increasing the authorization for the storm and hurricane restoration and impact minimization program. | |
| $15,000,000 | Increasing the per-project limit for the storm and hurricane restoration program. | |
| $15,000,000 | Increasing the per-project limit for small river and harbor improvement projects. | |
| $15,000,000 | Increasing the annual authorization for removing obstructions and clearing channels. | |
| $1,000,000 | Increasing the per-project limit for removing obstructions and clearing channels. | |
| $15,000,000 | Increasing the per-project limit for shore damage prevention or mitigation. | |
| $15,000,000 | Increasing the per-project limit for regional sediment management. | |
| $90,000,000 | Increasing the annual authorization for small flood control projects. | |
| $15,000,000 | Increasing the per-project limit for small flood control projects. | |
| $50,000,000 for each fiscal year | Authorizing appropriations for stormwater management projects. | |
| $10,000,000 | Authorizing appropriations for the removal of abandoned vessels from navigable waters. | |
| $28,500,000 | Increasing the federal cost limit for projects under the Tribal partnership program. | |
| $15,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2024 through 2029 | Authorizing appropriations for a pilot program allowing Indian Tribes to directly implement water resources projects. | |
| $60,000,000 | Increasing the authorization for Las Vegas, Nevada environmental infrastructure projects. | |
| $12,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in Buckeye, Arizona. | |
| $5,000,000 | Providing for environmental infrastructure in Flagstaff, Arizona. | |
| $5,200,000 | Providing for environmental infrastructure in Glendale, Arizona. | |
| $10,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in the City of Page, Arizona. | |
| $4,800,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in Sahuarita, Arizona. | |
| $10,000,000 | Providing for environmental infrastructure for the Tohono O’odham Nation, Arizona. | |
| $30,000,000 | Providing for environmental infrastructure in Tucson, Arizona. | |
| $3,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in the City of Winslow, Arizona. | |
| $4,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in the City of Adelanto, California. | |
| $10,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in the town of Aptos, California. | |
| $20,000,000 | Providing for environmental infrastructure for the Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers, California. | |
| $2,500,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in the city of Bishop, California. | |
| $20,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in Bloomington, California. | |
| $50,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in Butte County, California. | |
| $1,902,808 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in California City, California. | |
| $11,000,000 | Providing for water and water supply infrastructure in the City of Carson, California. | |
| $35,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in Cedar Glen, California. | |
| $10,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in Culver City, California. | |
| $20,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in the city of Colton, California. | |
| $50,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in East San Fernando Valley, California. | |
| $20,000,000 | Providing for water and water supply infrastructure in Fresno County, California. | |
| $20,500,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure for the Georgetown Divide Public Utility District, California. | |
| $10,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in the city of Grand Terrace, California. | |
| $15,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in the city of Hayward, California. | |
| $5,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in the city of Hollister, California. | |
| $50,000,000 | Providing for water and water supply infrastructure in Kern County, California. | |
| $20,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in Lake County, California. | |
| $20,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in the Lake Tahoe Basin. | |
| $4,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in the City of La Quinta, California. | |
| $8,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in the city of Lakewood, California. | |
| $6,000,000 | Providing for water, wastewater, and environmental infrastructure in Lawndale, California. | |
| $7,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in the town of Lone Pine, California. | |
| $5,500,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in the city of Lomita, California. | |
| $4,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in the city of Los Banos, California. | |
| $4,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in the town of Los Olivos, California. | |
| $12,000,000 | Providing for water and water supply infrastructure in the city of Lynwood, California. | |
| $27,500,000 | Providing for water and water supply infrastructure in Madera County, California. | |
| $15,000,000 | Providing for water and water supply infrastructure in the city of Milpitas, California. | |
| $18,250,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in the town of Montecito, California. | |
| $30,000,000 | Providing for environmental infrastructure for the Oakland-Alameda Estuary, California. | |
| $40,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in the city of Oxnard, California. | |
| $10,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in the city of Patterson, California. | |
| $35,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in Pomona, California. | |
| $10,000,000 | Providing for water and water supply infrastructure in the city of Rohnert Park, California. | |
| $20,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in the city of Salinas, California. | |
| $10,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in San Benito County, California. | |
| $18,250,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in the City of San Buenaventura, California. | |
| $200,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in San Diego County, California. | |
| $5,000,000 | Providing for water and water supply infrastructure in the city of South Gate, California. | |
| $5,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in San Luis Obispo County, California. | |
| $10,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in Stanislaus County, California. | |
| $10,000,000 | Providing for environmental infrastructure in the Tijuana River Valley Watershed, California. | |
| $20,000,000 | Providing for water and water supply infrastructure in Tulare County, California. | |
| $28,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in the city of Watsonville, California. | |
| $20,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in Yolo County, California. | |
| $6,500,000 | Providing for water and water supply infrastructure for the Yorba Linda Water District, California. | |
| $20,000,000 | Providing for environmental infrastructure in El Paso County, Colorado. | |
| $50,000,000 | Providing for water and water supply infrastructure in Fremont County, Colorado. | |
| $25,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in the town of East Hampton, Connecticut. | |
| $25,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in the town of East Lyme, Connecticut. | |
| $25,000,000 | Providing for environmental infrastructure in several Delaware coastal towns. | |
| $25,000,000 | Providing for environmental infrastructure in Wilmington, Delaware. | |
| $25,000,000 | Providing for environmental infrastructure in several Delaware communities. | |
| $50,000,000 | Providing for water and water-related infrastructure in Broward County, Florida. | |
| $31,200,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in the City of Deltona, Florida. | |
| $2,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in the Town of Longboat Key, Florida. | |
| $10,000,000 | Providing for water and water supply infrastructure in Marion County, Florida. | |
| $10,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in the city of Oviedo, Florida. | |
| $5,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in Osceola County, Florida. | |
| $45,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in Central Florida. | |
| $50,000,000 | Providing for environmental infrastructure in Coastal Georgia. | |
| $10,000,000 | Providing for environmental infrastructure in Muscogee, Henry, and Clayton Counties, Georgia. | |
| $5,000,000 | Providing for environmental infrastructure in Cobb County, Georgia. | |
| $40,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in DeKalb County, Georgia. | |
| $10,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in the city of Porterdale, Georgia. | |
| $20,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in the city of Burley, Idaho. | |
| $17,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in the city of Belvidere, Illinois. | |
| $10,000,000 | Providing for environmental infrastructure in Calumet City, Illinois. | |
| $5,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in the village of Clarendon Hills, Illinois. | |
| $9,500,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure along the Fox River, Illinois. | |
| $5,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in the village of German Valley, Illinois. | |
| $4,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in the city of LaSalle, Illinois. | |
| $4,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in the city of Rockford, Illinois. | |
| $2,000,000 | Providing for water and water supply infrastructure in the city of Savanna, Illinois. | |
| $7,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in the village of Sherrard, Illinois. | |
| $35,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in Wyandotte County and Kansas City, Kansas. | |
| $14,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in the city of Brownsville, Kentucky. | |
| $7,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in the city of Monroe, Louisiana. | |
| $50,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in Pointe Celeste, Louisiana. | |
| $10,000,000 | Providing for environmental infrastructure in Easthampton, Massachusetts. | |
| $1,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in the town of Franklin, Massachusetts. | |
| $5,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in Northampton, Massachusetts. | |
| $1,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in the town of Winthrop, Massachusetts. | |
| $3,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in the city of Milan, Michigan. | |
| $58,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in Southeast Michigan. | |
| $5,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in the city of Elysian, Minnesota. | |
| $3,200,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in the city of Le Sueur, Minnesota. | |
| $7,000,000 | Providing for environmental infrastructure in Byram, Mississippi. | |
| $4,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in the city of Columbia, Mississippi. | |
| $7,000,000 | Providing for environmental infrastructure in Diamondhead, Mississippi. | |
| $7,000,000 | Providing for environmental infrastructure in Hancock County, Mississippi. | |
| $5,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in the city of Laurel, Mississippi. | |
| $7,000,000 | Providing for environmental infrastructure in Madison, Mississippi. | |
| $11,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in the city of Moss Point, Mississippi. | |
| $10,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in the city of Olive Branch, Mississippi. | |
| $7,000,000 | Providing for environmental infrastructure in Pearl, Mississippi. | |
| $5,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in the city of Picayune, Mississippi. | |
| $6,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in the city of Starkville, Mississippi. | |
| $29,000,000 | Providing for water infrastructure in the town of Laughlin, Nevada. | |
| $10,000,000 | Providing for environmental infrastructure in Nye County, Nevada. | |
| $4,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in the town of Pahrump, Nevada. | |
| $10,000,000 | Providing for environmental infrastructure in Storey County, Nevada. | |
| $25,000,000 | Providing for environmental infrastructure in New Hampshire. | |
| $10,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in Belmar Township, New Jersey. | |
| $40,000,000 | Providing for environmental infrastructure in Cape May County, New Jersey. | |
| $10,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in Colesville, New Jersey. | |
| $4,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in Deptford Township, New Jersey. | |
| $10,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in Lacey Township, New Jersey. | |
| $18,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in the borough of Merchantville, New Jersey. | |
| $10,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in the borough of Park Ridge, New Jersey. | |
| $3,200,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in Washington Township, New Jersey. | |
| $20,000,000 | Providing for wastewater infrastructure in the town of Bernalillo, New Mexico. | |
| $10,000,000 | Providing for wastewater infrastructure in the village of Bosque Farms, New Mexico. | |
| $3,450,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in the town of Carmel, New York. | |
| $10,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in Dutchess County, New York. | |
| $100,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in Kings County, New York. | |
| $100,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure near the Mohawk River, New York. | |
| $2,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in Mount Pleasant, New York. | |
| $20,000,000 | Providing for environmental infrastructure in New Rochelle, New York. | |
| $25,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure near Newtown Creek, New York. | |
| $60,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in New York County, New York. | |
| $10,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in Orange County, New York. | |
| $2,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in Sleepy Hollow, New York. | |
| $10,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in Ulster County, New York. | |
| $4,000,000 | Providing for water infrastructure in the town of Ramapo, New York. | |
| $25,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure on Rikers Island, New York. | |
| $10,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in the town of Yorktown, New York. | |
| $41,025,650 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in Canton, North Carolina. | |
| $7,137,500 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in Fairmont, North Carolina. | |
| $1,500,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in Murphy, North Carolina. | |
| $3,474,350 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in Robbinsville, North Carolina. | |
| $4,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in Weaverville, North Carolina. | |
| $5,500,000 | Providing for environmental infrastructure in the City of Akron, Ohio. | |
| $350,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in Apple Creek, Ohio. | |
| $1,500,000 | Providing for environmental infrastructure in Ashtabula County, Ohio. | |
| $6,500,000 | Providing for environmental infrastructure in Bloomingburg, Ohio. | |
| $170,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in Brooklyn Heights, Ohio. | |
| $3,500,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure for the Chagrin Falls regional water system, Ohio. | |
| $11,500,000 | Providing for environmental infrastructure in Cuyahoga County, Ohio. | |
| $13,000,000 | Providing for environmental infrastructure in East Cleveland, Ohio. | |
| $16,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in Erie County, Ohio. | |
| $7,100,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in the city of Huron, Ohio. | |
| $1,000,000 | Providing for wastewater infrastructure in the village of Kelleys Island, Ohio. | |
| $1,175,165 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in the city of North Olmsted, Ohio. | |
| $11,800,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in the City of Painesville, Ohio. | |
| $14,137,341 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in the city of Solon, Ohio. | |
| $25,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in Summit County, Ohio. | |
| $24,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in Stark County, Ohio. | |
| $500,000 | Providing for environmental infrastructure in Struthers, Ohio. | |
| $10,500,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in the cities of Toledo and Oregon, Ohio. | |
| $15,400,000 | Providing for wastewater infrastructure in the city of Vermilion, Ohio. | |
| $750,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in the city of Westlake, Ohio. | |
| $30,000,000 | Providing for environmental infrastructure in the city of Stillwater, Oklahoma. | |
| $10,000,000 | Providing for water supply in the city of Beaverton, Oregon. | |
| $50,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in Clackamas County, Oregon. | |
| $50,000,000 | Providing for water infrastructure and water supply in Washington County, Oregon. | |
| $38,600,000 | Providing for environmental infrastructure in Pennsylvania. | |
| $7,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in Berks County, Pennsylvania. | |
| $7,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in Chester County, Pennsylvania. | |
| $2,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in Franklin Township, Pennsylvania. | |
| $50,000,000 | Providing for wastewater infrastructure in the boroughs of Telford, Franconia, and Lower Safford, Pennsylvania. | |
| $5,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in the borough of Pen Argyl, Pennsylvania. | |
| $3,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in Chesterfield County, South Carolina. | |
| $8,800,000 | Providing for water, wastewater, and other environmental infrastructure in Cheraw, South Carolina. | |
| $40,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in Florence County, South Carolina. | |
| $15,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in the city of Lake City, South Carolina. | |
| $35,000,000 | Providing for wastewater and water supply infrastructure in Tipton County, Tennessee. | |
| $50,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in Tipton, Haywood, and Fayette Counties, Tennessee. | |
| $50,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in the city of Austin, Texas. | |
| $38,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in the City of Amarillo, Texas. | |
| $40,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in the City of Brownsville, Texas. | |
| $5,000,000 | Providing for water infrastructure in the city of Clarendon, Texas. | |
| $1,250,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in the city of Quinlan, Texas. | |
| $7,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in the city of Runaway Bay, Texas. | |
| $20,000,000 | Providing for wastewater infrastructure and water supply in Webb County, Texas. | |
| $20,000,000 | Providing for water and wastewater infrastructure in Zapata County, Texas. | |
| $1,300,000 | Providing for wastewater infrastructure in King William County, Virginia. | |
| $1,000,000 | Providing for wastewater infrastructure and water quality improvements near the Potomac River, Virginia. | |
| $9,000,000 | Providing for water infrastructure in the city of Chelan, Washington. | |
| $5,000,000 | Providing for environmental infrastructure in the city of College Place, Washington. | |
| $4,000,000 | Providing for water, wastewater, and environmental infrastructure in Ferndale, Washington. | |
| $4,000,000 | Providing for water, wastewater, and environmental infrastructure in Lynden, Washington. | |
| $14,000,000 | Providing for environmental infrastructure in the city of Othello, Washington. | |
| $10,000,000 | Limiting the increased Federal share for an environmental infrastructure pilot program to not exceed this amount annually. | |
| $8,000,000 | Increasing the authorized funding for the Faulkner Island, Connecticut project. | |
| $3,000,000 | Authorizing appropriations for a study of the Larose to Golden Meadow, Louisiana project. | |
| $65,000,000 | Increasing the authorized funding for the Missouri River levee system. | |
| $242,000,000 | Authorizing environmental assistance for water-related infrastructure and resource protection projects in Western Washington. | |
| $75,000,000 | Authorizing environmental assistance for water-related infrastructure projects in Kentucky and West Virginia. | |
| $50,000,000 | Authorizing environmental assistance for water-related infrastructure projects in Southeastern North Carolina. | |
| $300,000,000 | Increasing the authorization for water-related environmental infrastructure projects in Ohio and North Dakota. | |
| $150,000,000 | Increasing authorized funding for water-related environmental infrastructure projects in Northern West Virginia. | |
| $170,000,000 | Increasing authorized funding for water resources development projects in Southern West Virginia. | |
| $90,000,000 | Increasing authorized funding for the preservation and restoration of Acequias irrigation systems. | |
| $72,647,000 | Improving navigation at Akutan Harbor, Akutan, AK. | |
| $642,530,000 | Widening turning basins in Oakland Harbor, Oakland, CA. | |
| $1,148,260,000 | Funding deep draft navigation improvements in Tampa Harbor, FL. | |
| $71,687,000 | Modifying the Seagirt Loop Channel in Baltimore Harbor, MD. | |
| $15,632,000 | Managing coastal storm risk for Metropolitan Washington, DC and VA. | |
| $141,766,000 | Managing coastal storm risk at Ponte Vedra Beach, St. Johns County, FL. | |
| $2,701,000,000 | Managing coastal storm risk in Miami-Dade Back Bay, FL. | |
| $79,138,000 | Managing coastal storm risk for the Baltimore Metropolitan area, MD. | |
| $2,143,800,000 | Managing coastal storm risk for the South Shore of Staten Island, NY. | |
| $258,580,000 | Managing coastal storm risk in Puerto Rico. | |
| $333,370,000 | Managing coastal storm risk along the Rhode Island coastline. | |
| $5,980,493,000 | Managing coastal storm and flood risk in St. Tammany Parish, LA. | |
| $322,761,000 | Studying coastal resilience for the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway in Texas. | |
| $26,738,000 | Managing flood risk and restoring ecosystems in DeSoto County, MS. | |
| $100,219,000 | Managing flood risk in the Tar Pamlico River Basin, NC. | |
| $45,731,000 | Improving the Manhattan, Kansas Federal Levee System. | |
| $14,306,000 | Managing flood risk for the University City Branch, River Des Peres, MO. | |
| $320,000,000 | Providing financial assistance to Florida for the North Feeder Stormwater Treatment Area. | |
| $1,800,000,000 | Redistributing unobligated TIFIA program contract authority to States. |
National defense
Report on security at Soo Locks, Michigan
Requires a report on security deficiencies, potential threats, and the economic and supply chain effects of a failure at the Soo Locks in Michigan.
Social services
Tribal partnership program expansion
Expands eligibility for the Tribal partnership program to inter-tribal consortiums and Tribal organizations and broadens the scope of authorized activities.
Report on recreational access for individuals with disabilities
Requires a report on access for individuals with disabilities at Corps of Engineers recreational areas, including compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act.
Report on property buyouts for coastal storm risk management
Requires a report on Corps of Engineers policies related to using mandatory property buyouts as part of coastal storm risk management projects.
Study on land valuation for Tribal Partnership Program
Requires a study on appropriate procedures for determining the value of real estate and cost-share contributions for projects under the Tribal Partnership Program.
GAO study on environmental justice initiatives
Requires the GAO to analyze the costs, benefits, and effects of the Secretary's environmental justice initiatives within the civil works program.
GAO study on homeless encampments on Corps property
Requires the GAO to analyze unauthorized homeless encampments on Corps of Engineers projects and lands, their impacts, and efforts to remove or deter them.
Increased federal share for West Virginia disadvantaged communities
Increases the Federal cost share to 90% for water infrastructure projects in Northern and Southern West Virginia that benefit economically disadvantaged communities.
Establishment of the Denali Housing Fund
Creates a revolving fund in the U.S. Treasury to provide grants and loans for housing construction and rehabilitation for low and moderate-income households in rural Alaska.
| Amount | Description | |
|---|---|---|
| $5,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2025 through 2029 | Authorizing appropriations for the Denali Housing Fund to support housing construction and rehabilitation in rural Alaska. |

