Summary
Gets rid of the rule that protects websites and online services from being sued over content that their users post.
What problem does this solve?
Currently, online platforms are not legally responsible for most things their users post, which can allow harmful content to remain online. This bill makes these platforms legally accountable for user content by removing their special protection.
Who does this affect?
- Online platforms (e.g., social media, forums)
- Technology companies
- Internet users
What does this bill do?
Repeals Section 230
Completely removes Section 230 from the Communications Act of 1934, ending the legal shield that protects online platforms from liability for third-party content.
Updates numerous federal laws
Changes several other federal laws to remove references to Section 230, ensuring consistency across the U.S. Code after its repeal.
Redefines 'Internet' in trademark law
Changes the legal definition of 'Internet' in the Trademark Act of 1946, replacing a reference to Section 230 with a new, direct definition.
What is the real world impact?
•
Could lead to more online censorship
To avoid lawsuits, platforms might remove large amounts of user content, even if it isn't illegal. This could limit free speech and open discussion on the internet.
•
Increases accountability for online platforms
Makes websites and social media companies legally responsible for the content posted by their users, aiming to reduce the spread of harmful material.
•
May harm smaller online businesses
Smaller websites and startups may not be able to afford the legal costs of defending against lawsuits over user content, potentially forcing them to shut down or be acquired by larger competitors.
When does this start?
This bill would go into effect as soon as it is signed into law.